Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 5(18), 45–56.įoster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. Analysis of Direct and Indirect Effect of Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Disparity ( Case Study Provinces in East and West Indonesia Year 2006-2012 ). Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 49(1), 61–84. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies The determinants of poverty dynamics in Indonesia : evidence from panel data. Public Administration and Development, 23(1), 77–88.ĭartanto, T., & Nurkholis. Decentralisation and Poverty Reduction in Africa: The Political of Local-Central Relations. Jurnal Ekonomi Kuantitatif Terapan, 11(1), 53–60.Ĭrook, R. Analisis Kemiskinan Di Provinsi Jawa Tengah Dengan Pendekatan Spatial Autoregressive Model.
Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 44(2), 101–120. Determinants of poverty in rural Ethiopia. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.īogale, A., Hagedorn, K., & Korf, B. Penghitungan Dan Analisis Kemiskinan Makro Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.īadan Pusat Statistik. E-Jurnal EP Unud, 2(8), 384–392.īadan Pusat Statistik. Pengaruh Produk Domestik Regional Bruto, Pendidikan, Pengangguran terhadap Kemiskinan di Provinsi Bali. International Journal of Social Economics, 39(3), 168–181. Socioeconomic determinants of poverty among urban households in South-West Nigeria. Īkerele, D., Momoh, S., Samuel A Adewuyi, Biola B. Cogent Economics and Finance, 6(1), 1–14. Reducing poverty through fiscal decentralization in Ghana and beyond: A review. An International Multi-Disciplinary Journal, 3(2), 162–177.Īgyemang-Duah, W., Kafui Gbedoho, E., Peprah, P., Arthur, F., Kweku Sobeng, A., Okyere, J., & Mengba Dokbila, J. Determinants of Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa. European Journal of Social Sciences, 13(1), 38–46.Īdeyemi, S. A Logistic Regression Model to Identify Key Determinants of Poverty Using Demographic and Health Survey Data. Keywords : Poverty Economic Growth Human Development Decentralization Regional Status JEL Classification :I32 015 040 R11Īchia, T. In addition, without ignoring the decentralization policy, the management of potential resources needs to be optimized to increase the ability and independence of the region in financing regional expenditure, particularly in poverty alleviation programs. Government policies need to be for - med in forming partnerships with the public and the private sector in improving economic performance and human development in order to improve the welfare of the community. The results of this study also show that regional status and fiscal decentralization have not been able to significantly influence poverty reduction. Other findings, show an increase in the quality of human resources as a form of human development in proxy with the human development index is also able to reduce poverty levels. The findings of this study are an increase in economic performance which is proxied by economic growth that can reduce poverty levels in districts and cities in Papua Province. This research uses quantitative methodology with multiple linear regression analysis cross-section analysis tools.
Determinants of poverty include economic growth, human development, decentralization, and regional status. The purpose of this study is to analyze the determinants of poverty in regencies and cities in Papua Province. Heterogeneity of poverty occurs in the districts and cities of Papua. The number of poor people in Papua has increased and the position of poverty levels is higher than the national level. Poverty in Indonesia experiences a declining trend, both in number and percentage, but Pa - pua Province is not the case.